Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Act Of results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,733 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,396 of 16,562 topics). This Trade Act Of is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Trade Act Of
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,733
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.5%20.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos