Topic summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tractor Customization results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 339 hits . Analysis detected 1,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,335 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,993 of 16,208 topics). This Tractor Customization is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Tractor Customization
Topic details
Total words: 1,335
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst