Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tomatoes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 3,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,990 of 16,562 topics). This Tomatoes is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Tomatoes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos