Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tipped Workers results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 5,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,264 of 16,562 topics). This Tipped Workers is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Tipped Workers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos