Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiktok Sale results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 2,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,653 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,165 of 16,562 topics). This Tiktok Sale is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Tiktok Sale
Topic details
Total words: 1,653
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.9% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 50.0% 50.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 21.2% 21.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 50.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst