Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiktok Challenges results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Recency Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,332 of 15,145 topics). This Tiktok Challenges is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Tiktok Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos