Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiger Woods results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 4,022 hits . Analysis detected 20,447 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,658 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,167 of 16,562 topics). This Tiger Woods is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Tiger Woods
Topic details
Total words: 13,658
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.7% 20.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.4% 29.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst