Topic summary
ā 10%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiger Shark results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 530 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,797 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 19% (13,558 of 16,562 topics). This Tiger Shark is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Tiger Shark
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 19%Tiger Shark (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,797
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos