Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Through The Lens results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 1,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of 96% (750 of 16,562 topics). This Through The Lens is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Through The Lens
Topic details
Total words: 600
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.5% percentile 12.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 53.5% 53.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 39.0% 39.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 23.2% 23.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 21.7% 21.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 53.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst