Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Through The Lens results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 1,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of 96% (750 of 16,562 topics). This Through The Lens is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Through The Lens
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 600
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.5% percentile
12.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 53.5%53.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 39.0%39.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.2%23.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.2%16.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 53.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos