Topic summary
15% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Threat Intelligence results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,172 hits . Analysis detected 7,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,108 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,217 of 16,562 topics). This Threat Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Threat Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 14,108
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst