Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Third Party Integrations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Third Party Integrations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Third Party Integrations
Topic details
Total words: 1,932
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.7%26.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.6%7.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos