Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thermal Plumes results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 525 hits . Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,787 of 16,447 topics). This Thermal Plumes is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Thermal Plumes
Topic details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst