Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theocracy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,281 hits. Analysis detected 10,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,723 of 16,562 topics). This Theocracy is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Theocracy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos