Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Walking Dead Universe results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 2,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,593 of 16,562 topics). This The Walking Dead Universe is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
The Walking Dead Universe
Topic details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos