Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Trials Of Marvin Mutch results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,046 of 16,562 topics). This The Trials Of Marvin Mutch is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
The Trials Of Marvin Mutch
Topic details
Total words: 1,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos