Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New Face Of Small Business results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 3,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,460 of 16,562 topics). This The New Face Of Small Business is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
The New Face Of Small Business
Topic details
Total words: 5,624
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos