Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Masters results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 1,438 hits. Analysis detected 7,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,747 of 16,562 topics). This The Masters is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
The Masters
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.2%32.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos