Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Birds results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 5,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,729 of 16,562 topics). This The Birds is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
The Birds
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos