Topic summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Big Bang Theory results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 620 hits . Analysis detected 1,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,965 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,713 of 16,562 topics). This The Big Bang Theory is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. The Big Bang Theory
Topic details
Total words: 1,965
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.6% 31.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst