Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Texas Wildlife results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 813 hits. Analysis detected 5,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Wildlife is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Texas Wildlife
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos