Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Tech Red Raiders results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 4,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,119 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Tech Red Raiders is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Texas Tech Red Raiders
Topic details
Total words: 5,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos