Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Crime results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,339 hits. Analysis detected 6,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,279 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Crime is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Texas Crime
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,864
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.3%24.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.5%27.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.7%25.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos