Topic summary
ā 19%1 analyzed article/video951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Courts Of Appeals results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 2,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 49% (8,442 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Courts Of Appeals is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Texas Courts Of Appeals
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 49%Texas Courts Of Appeals (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos