Topic summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos2,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Testosterone Replacement Therapy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 656 hits. Analysis detected 4,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,291 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,054 of 16,562 topics). This Testosterone Replacement Therapy is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Testosterone Replacement Therapy
Topic details
Total words: 6,291
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos