Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Terrorism Prevention results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Biased Writer Voice, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Terrorism Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Terrorism Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 23.0%23.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 18.5%18.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 21.4%21.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.2%8.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos