Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Terrorism Investigations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 2,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,046 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Terrorism Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Terrorism Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 2,046
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos