Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terrorism And Media results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 1,642 hits . Analysis detected 9,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,706 of 16,562 topics). This Terrorism And Media is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Terrorism And Media
Topic details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.6% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.6% 30.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst