Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terrorism And Media results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 1,642 hits. Analysis detected 9,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,706 of 16,562 topics). This Terrorism And Media is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Terrorism And Media
Topic details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.6%30.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.1%18.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.1%17.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate