Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos2,518 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tenant Organizing results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 929 hits. Analysis detected 8,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,554 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,158 of 15,689 topics). This Tenant Organizing is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Tenant Organizing
Topic details
Total words: 7,554
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos