Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Liability results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 697 hits. Analysis detected 3,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,236 of 16,131 topics). This Technology Liability is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Technology Liability
Topic details
Total words: 5,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos