Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Investment results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 608 hits. Analysis detected 5,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,488 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,702 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Investment is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Technology Investment
Topic details
Total words: 6,488
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos