Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology AI Detection results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 822 hits. Analysis detected 5,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,002 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,926 of 16,562 topics). This Technology AI Detection is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Technology AI Detection
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠71%Technology AI Detection (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,002
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.5%20.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos