Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Acquisition results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,599 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,398 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Acquisition is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Technology Acquisition
Topic details
Total words: 1,599
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos