Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Technological Independence results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 2,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,494 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Technological Independence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Technological Independence
Topic details
Total words: 1,494
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.7%15.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos