Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video2,579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technofascism results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,785 hits. Analysis detected 9,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,737 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,083 of 16,562 topics). This Technofascism is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Technofascism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,737
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos