Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,497 hits. Analysis detected 9,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,825 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,712 of 16,562 topics). This Tech Policy is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Tech Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,825
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos