Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Liability results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,837 hits. Analysis detected 15,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,028 of 16,562 topics). This Tech Liability is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Tech Liability
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos