Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Liability results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,837 hits . Analysis detected 15,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,028 of 16,562 topics). This Tech Liability is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Tech Liability
Topic details
Total words: 11,136
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst