Topic summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Censorship results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 3,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (932 of 16,562 topics). This Tech Censorship is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Tech Censorship
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.4% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 39.3%39.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 25.6%25.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 19.7%19.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.6%23.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.3%32.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 12.4%12.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.3%34.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 39.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 19.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos