Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Team Support results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Sunk Cost Effect , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 103 hits . Analysis detected 942 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,727 of 16,562 topics). This Team Support is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Team Support
Topic details
Total words: 1,232
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst