Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Team Analysis results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 768 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 23,330 topics). This Team Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Team Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos