Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teacher Layoffs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,453 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,034 of 16,562 topics). This Teacher Layoffs is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Teacher Layoffs
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠34%Teacher Layoffs (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,453
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos