Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teacher Appointments results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 392 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (18,907 of 23,612 topics). This Teacher Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Teacher Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 2,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos