Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Refunds results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75.9% saturation with 1,525 hits . Analysis detected 10,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of 99% (260 of 16,562 topics). This Tax Refunds is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Tax Refunds
Topic details
Total words: 2,010
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.4% percentile 19.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 75.9% 75.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 74.4% 74.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 52.1% 52.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 42.3% 42.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 36.3% 36.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 39.8% 39.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 30.9% 30.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 36.8% 36.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 23.8% 23.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Optimism Bias: Topic 75.9%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 74.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 52.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 42.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Composition/Division: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst