Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taverns results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 715 hits. Analysis detected 6,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,488 of 16,562 topics). This Taverns is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Taverns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos