Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tango results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,188 hits. Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,131 topics). This Tango is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tango
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos