Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Synagogue Attack results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,165 of 16,562 topics). This Synagogue Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Synagogue Attack
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠57%Synagogue Attack (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos