Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video1,348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swedish Economy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,322 of 16,558 topics). This Swedish Economy is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Swedish Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos