Topic summary
⁠9%2 analyzed articles/videos741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swat Operations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,337 of 16,562 topics). This Swat Operations is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Swat Operations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos