Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Fuels results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 1,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,529 of 15,786 topics). This Sustainable Fuels is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Sustainable Fuels
Topic details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos