Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sustainable Development Goals results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 119 hits . Analysis detected 837 faulty-reasoning hits from 711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sustainable Development Goals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sustainable Development Goals
Topic details
Total words: 711
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles711 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 16.7% 16.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst