Topic summary
27%3 analyzed articles/videos2,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supply Chain Attacks results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 5,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,203 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,693 of 15,854 topics). This Supply Chain Attacks is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Supply Chain Attacks
Topic details
Total words: 7,203
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate